Friday, September 17, 2010

I'm back in BIG SKY COUNTRY!

It's so nice to be back in the Bitterroot Valley. It's been awhile. It took two days (leisurely days as we limit our driving to about 5 hrs and then look for a place to spend the night) to get here via Salmon, ID.
We hadn't even left the town of Lehi, UT when we were treated to one of the heaviest hail storms I've ever witnessed. Naturally it waited until we pulled out from the protective cover over the fuel pumps. Then about two hours later driving up I-15 we heard a flap, flap, flap, of one of our 5th wheel tires coming apart. We immediately pulled over to the shoulder and limped up to the next off ramp and stopped to change a tire, a process of which I've become expert. I looked in my side view mirror and saw flashing lights directly behind me. It didn't look like a highway patrol car. It was a box van???? It turned out to be what I call a Freeway Angel. He offered to help. Help? All I had to do was pull out our spare and he did the rest - even aired up my spare with a compressor he had in his truck. I couldn't believe our good fortune as he informed me there was no charge - just a free service compliments of Utah. Wow! He directed us to the nearest tire shop where we purchased a replacement tire, had lunch, and we're on the road again in about an hour. We stayed overnight in Idaho Falls and arrive here in Victor, MT the next afternoon.

Wood turned pens by Lane: During our stay in Lehi, Lane showed me his collection of wood turned pens. I was so impressed that I promised to display them here on my Blog. They are custom made for each customer who selects not only the pen style but also the exotic wood for their one of a kind pen.

Here is are some samples of his handiwork. Reading from left to right, first is the Slimline model turned from Olive wood from central Africa, next is the Wall Street model made from Cobola wood from Central America, third is the Cigar model made from Tulip wood of Brazil, and fourth is the Rifle Cartridge pen made from Wenge wood out of South Africa. The Slimline uses a Cross pen refill while the rest use Parker refills. I am so impressed with the fine craftmenship of these pens I wanted to share them with you in case you needed an idea for a Christmas gift. They retail for $50 and can be ordered direct from Lane by calling 1-801-722-8914.



I subscribe to a email newsletter called "FineArtViews"which recently had the following post in it which I want to share with you. It explains certain art viewpoints which I myself have observed and find strange. I think the title should have been "What is a Painting" See if you agree.


Thinking Like A Realist
by Shawn Sullivan

This post is by guest author, Shawn Sullivan. This article has been edited and published with the author's permission. You should submit an article and share your views as a guest author by clicking here.
We've promoted this post to feature status because it provides great value to the FineArtViews community. If you want your blog posts listed in the FineArtViews newsletter with the possibility of being republished to our 12,000+ subscribers,consider blogging with FASO Artist Websites. This author's views are entirely his own and may not always reflect the views of BoldBrush, Inc.
What is a painting? Technically it's an object that has paint on it. In the early part of the twentieth century modernist painters attempted to come to terms with that fact by increasingly flattening the illusionistic space within their paintings. The logical conclusion of these efforts was Minimalism - where the object becomes the art. When you have an all white canvas all that can be discussed is the support, how it's mounted to the wall, even the brushstrokes themselves take on this object like quality.

The realist painter can never think of a painting as an object. It is all about the illusion. The painting is a window where things are to be viewed that exist on the other side of the picture plane. What the painting is painted on, the thickness of the brushstrokes, these things are all secondary to the success or failure of the illusion. Has the artist convincingly placed the viewer in the world of the painting?

One of the problems that the modernist critic has in recognizing contemporary realism is that they are unable to see past the picture plane. They want to talk about the realist painting as an object. How is it made? Are the brushstrokes thick or thin? Was it made by a man or a woman, or a person of color? They have lost the ability to enter into the space of a painting. They lack imagination.

Although the illusion of reality is the ultimate goal, it is not achieved in the same way in all paintings. Besides the illusion of depth, all realist paintings have what can be thought of as the artist's atmosphere, the air between the picture plane and the thing depicted. In some paintings this air is very crisp; there is a stillness, a pin dropping would sound like a gunshot. In other paintings the air is very thick. The things depicted are in a state of flux. Molecules are whirling, light is bouncing, nothing is what it seems. Of course there are thousands of variations between these two extremes. That's what the modernist critics are missing when they take a realist painting at face value. To them it's an object denying it's an object; a modernist sin.

Some realist painters think that if they play the modernist game they will be accepted. Their work will be relevant. They believe that adding a non-objective, abstract expressionist like background, or making a painting that comments on current events is a way to appease the modernist critic. The modernist critic will never accept realism because they simply cannot see it. Their way of looking at paintings as objects first is opposed to an illusionistic way of seeing. The realist painter who flattens the space of their paintings to seem avante garde is, in effect, killing the illusion and creating an object. Objects can be decorative. The best realist paintings never are. The realist painter who paints topical subject matter in an attempt to seem current has turned their painting into a document. A document is an object.

One of the differences between looking at a photograph and looking at a painting is that photographs always draw attention to their inherent flatness, even when they depict vast space. This is why paintings that are done from photographs often have that compressed space look to them. The camera does not see things in the same way that a human eye does. The camera does not perceive.

One of the problems that the internet age has caused for realist painters is the huge amount of paintings that are being viewed in a photographic state. When a photograph or digital image of a painting is presented, it also will struggle with that problem of inherent flatness. One can see this effect creeping into the work of contemporary realists where paintings are being made to look internet ready and the "air" of the painting is not being considered because in a reproduction it does not exist.

As realist painters, it is important to hold onto the qualities that make our way of seeing the world unique. It is important to go to museums and galleries and see great paintings firsthand. Stand before a work of art and dive into the space of a painting. Breathe the air that the artist breathed. Feel the warmth of the light as it washes through the painting.

A realist painting is not an object first and a painting second because a great painting is transcendent. It doesn't matter what the subject matter of the painting is because, ultimately, the subject is the artist striving to present their truth of the world and their attempt to come to grips with things that cannot be put into words.
----------------------------------------------
This article appears courtesy of FineArtViews by Canvoo,
a free email newsletter about art, marketing, inspiration and fine living for artists,
collectors and galleries (and anyone else who loves art).

This article originally appeared at:
http://fineartviews.com/blog/22939/thinking-like-a-realist

For a complimentary subscription, visit: http://www.fineartviews.com

While I'm not a realist painter, I am a representational painter, which can be close. As such I find the observations of so called "critics" interesting. Why can't everyone just be "real" instead of trying to impress us with gobbledygook? Just my two cents worth.

Please forward this Blog to anyone you feel might be interested in it and your comments are welcome. If you are a visitor and you would like to be added to my Blog email list please email me at ernie@erniekleven.com. Also please visit my website at http://www.erniekleven.com/ On the other hand if you wish to be removed from this list please reply with "Cancel" written in the subject line.


-----------------------------------------------